Delegate Thread - Curia Lab

Curia Delegate Platform

Key Information:

Name: Curia Lab

Delegate ENS: curia-delegates.eth
Delegate Address: 0x17296956b4E07Ff8931E4ff4eA06709FaB70b879
Delegate forum: v3naru_Curia, ​​Sosujung_Curia
Telegram: @v3dao, @sosujungeth
Twitter: https://twitter.com/curia_gov
Website: https://www.curiahub.xyz/

About Us

Curia Lab is a team of seasoned DAO governance researchers, data analysts, blockchain engineers, and developers. We are committed to strengthening the DAO ecosystem through specialized tools, insights, and delegate services.

Our Mission & Vision

Curia Lab is dedicated to empowering DAOs with robust, data-driven tools, ensuring transparency and efficiency in governance processes. Our mission extends beyond tool creation, we actively engage in DAO governance as a professional delegate, leveraging our hands-on experience to refine our tools for each DAO. This commitment to being part of the governance process ensures that our tools are battle-tested and evolved, addressing the challenges of data inaccessibility, opaque delegate actions, and governance risk assessments with precision and relevance.

Our vision is a future where the governance of DAOs is seamless, fully transparent, and informed by comprehensive data. We aspire to create an ecosystem where the influence of delegates is clear and their contributions are measurable, enabling real-time monitoring and strategic enhancement of DAO operations. We see Curia Lab at the forefront, leading DAOs into an era where every decision is strategic and data-driven, ensuring a resilient and dynamic governance model.

Our Goal for SafeDAO

Curia Lab is committed to aligning with SafeDAO’s mission to establish smart contract wallets as the default for interacting with web3 through account abstraction, fostering a secure, scalable, and user-friendly environment. We wanted to bring in our expertise in data & governance to enhance the transparency, accountability, and effectiveness of the SafeDAO ecosystem.

As active participants in SafeDAO governance, we plan to use our insights to advocate for decisions that strengthen decentralization and promote a vibrant, sustainable ecosystem. Our goal is to ensure that SafeDAO’s governance model is as robust and dynamic as the technologies it supports, making every decision strategic and data-informed to advance SafeDAO’s mission and principles effectively.

Disclosure

As a governance and DAO research team, we work with several other projects and DAOs, such as Optimism Collective, ArbitrumDAO, and GnosisDAO, to enhance their governance and decision-making processes. We are committed to maintaining transparency and avoiding conflicts of interest in our work with the SafeDAO community. When required, we will disclose any potential conflicts of interest that may arise in the course of our engagement.

Waiver of Liability

By delegating to Curia, you acknowledge and agree that Curia will participate in SafeDAO governance on a best-effort basis and will not be liable for any form of damages related to participation in SafeDAO governance.

PS: This thread is long overdue. I wanted create this to keep track of my SafeDAO votes, and provide another communication channel for us with fellow Safe community.

5 Likes

Proposals: [SEP #6] Safe Grants Program (SGP)

Vote: Accept

Rationale: Overall in support of this proposal, with some minor issues discussed on the forum.

Proposals: [SEP #7] Governance Framework

Vote: Accept

Rationale: We are excited about the SAFE DAO’s new governance framework, especially its structured seasonal timelines and the focus on continuous improvement. The review period for framework amendments, fostering a self-evolving system, is an innovative approach that we fully support.

Proposals: [SEP #8] Outcomes-based resource allocation framework (OBRA)

Vote: Accept

Rationale: The framework’s defined scope, governance hierarchy, submission and review processes, and compliance considerations are well thought out. The adjustments made to budgets and payout procedures, especially in response to community feedback, clearly demonstrate a commitment to the continuous evolution of SafeDAO’s governance practices.

Proposals: [SEP #9] Stablecoin allocation

Vote: Accept

Rationale: We endorse this proposal because it is in line with our current initiatives focused on the resource allocation framework. The idea of utilizing airdrop tokens obtained from another protocol to finance SafeDAO’s initial season’s strategies is a well-considered approach. This alignment ensures that our resources are utilized effectively and supports our strategic objectives.

Proposals: [SEP #10] OBRA strategies and budget

Vote: Accept

Rationale: After reviewing the proposal crafted by the SEF team and other contributors, we’re excited to see our strategies to focus on these issues. The clear goals, KPIs, and outlined budgets for the initial Seasons align well with our vision at SafeDAO.

Proposals: [SEP #11] Governance amendment Season 1 / Sprint 4

Vote: Accept

Rationale: The introduction of partial delegation, revised voting mechanisms for OBRA initiatives, and adjustments to the voting timeline are thoughtful responses to our previous experiences and future needs. Also extending the soft launch into Season 2 and clarifying funding for OBRA initiatives with dependencies are great steps forward to ensure our governance framework remains flexible and effective.

Proposals: [SEP #12] [OBRA] SafeDAO Governance Analytics Dashboard Services - Curia

Vote: Abstain

Rationale: Abstaining from our own initiative

Proposals: [SEP #13] [OBRA] Module Publishing, Audit Attestation Platform and Marketplace - ZenGuard

Vote: Accept

Rationale: Supporting this, as it would boost the Safe ecosystem via a plug-in marketplace, enhancing module development, auditing, and security.

Proposals: [SEP #14] [OBRA] Role-based Access Control & Pilot Browser Extension – Gnosis Guild

Vote: Accept

Rationale: We support extending Safe Roles and broadens use-cases, contribute to its modularity, security, and user adoption.

Proposals: [SEP #15] [OBRA] Enhancing Governance Accessibility and Participation at SafeDAO - StableLab

Vote: Accept

Rationale: Supporting StableLab’s initiative for its successful work on SGP, enhancing SafeDAO governance with digests & live to boost engagement.

Proposals: [SEP #16] [OBRA] Split Delegation - Gnosis Guild

Vote: Accept

Rationale: This is a great initiative to tackle our current issue on the concentration of voting power, really looking forward to its impact!

Proposals: [SEP #17] [OBRA] Contribution Efficiency System (CES) - Areta

Vote: Accept

Rationale: We see value in optimizing OBRA’s processes, potentially shortening onboarding durations and enhancing accountability for participants.

Proposals: [SEP #18] [OBRA] FinOps3: Accelerating Asset Management on Safe - LuukDAO

Vote: Accept

Rationale: We see value in platform that provide guidance for treasury teams, streamlining the learning curve for these operators.

Proposals: [SEP #19] [OBRA] Develop Ecosystem Accounts on Optimism - LuukDAO

Vote: Accept

Rationale: We see this as a great experiment to strengthen the Safe Ecosystem’s integration and user interaction on the Optimism network.

Proposals: [SEP #20] [OBRA] Formalizing the Guardian Role onchain with Hats Protocol - Hats Protocol

Vote: Accept

Rationale: Reason: We see its potential to streamline SafeDAO’s governance roles, enhance the Safe Guardian program, and boost efficiency and transparency.

Proposals: [SEP #21] SAFE Token Utility

Vote: Accept

Rationale: First of all, a big thank you to Steven and everyone involved in crafting the Safe Token Utility proposal. I am casting my vote in support of it. This proposal outlines a definitive path toward enriching the utility of the SAFE token, perfectly aligning with SafeDAO’s strategic goals. I am eager to see the Safe Activity Program unfold, in enhancing participation and contributions within the Safe ecosystem. Additionally, I commend the team’s dedication to encouraging community participation, ensuring that our collective insights significantly influence the SAFE token’s future trajectory. This proposal represents a critical juncture for the Safe Ecosystem, signaling our commitment to innovation, generating value, and fostering growth driven by our community.

Proposals: [SEP 22] Unpause SAFE Token Contract (Enabling Transferability)

Vote: Enable token transferability

Rationale: We support this proposal to unpause the SAFE token contract and enable transferability because it represents a pivotal step in SafeDAO’s governance and token utility. Having met all the predetermined milestones, we have demonstrated a collective readiness to elevate the SAFE token’s functionality and market presence. Enabling transferability will enhance the token’s utility and value, and also allow broader participation within the DAO, fostering a more robust and decentralized governance structure. This step is crucial for scaling our ecosystem and enhancing the intrinsic value of the SAFE token, ensuring that our governance framework adapts and evolves with the community’s needs and aspirations.

Proposals: [SEP 23][OBRA] Safe Token Utility Sprint 1

Vote: Accept

Rationale: We support this initiative because it promises to enhance the utility and value of the SAFE token within DeFi modules and staking. This initiative is spearheaded by a team of seasoned experts who have outlined a clear three-phase process to identify, evaluate, and specify the most promising use cases for the SAFE token. The detailed plan includes comprehensive stakeholder engagement, rigorous risk management, and transparent communication strategies, ensuring that the proposal not only aligns with SafeDAO’s strategic goals but also fosters an inclusive and informed community involvement. Additionally, the commitment to detailed metrics and KPIs will facilitate effective tracking and adjustment of the initiative, promising a high potential for successful implementation and significant impact on the ecosystem.

Proposals: [SEP 24] karpatkey - SAFE DAO Treasury Management Core Unit

Vote: Make no changes

Rationale: We’re voting against this proposal due to critical concerns about the proposal, particularly the lack of clearly defined KPIs for treasury management and an overly high pricing model. The absence of specific KPIs and established processes raises significant risks of mismanagement and misalignment with the DAO’s strategic objectives, compromising operational transparency. Furthermore, the proposed 2% fee on Assets Under Management (AUM) annually far exceeds the industry norm of 0.5% to 1.0%, which could unnecessarily erode the treasury’s value over time.

5 Likes

Proposals: [SEP #25] [OBRA] Palmera Module: Hierarchical Structure

Vote: Accept

Rationale: We support the Palmera Module proposal due to its alignment with SafeDAO’s strategic goals and its potential to enhance the Safe ecosystem. It’s great to see teams like Palmera innovating with novel modules that offer significant operational efficiencies, especially for high-value Safe users. The request for funding is reasonable, and the focus on rigorous, security audits ensures its robustness.

Proposals: [SEP 26] [OBRA] Three-Part Research Series on Ethereum Account Abstraction - Ethereum 2077

Vote: Accept

Rationale: We support this research proposal because it aligns with SafeDAO’s goals to enhance understanding and stimulate discussions within the Ethereum community, specifically in the area of account abstraction. This series will dissect and clarify complex EIPs, providing essential insights that could guide critical development paths and integration strategies for AA for the ecosystem. The experienced research team, structured funding tied to milestones, and the project’s strategic relevance to ongoing technical advancements make this initiative worth a shot for the future of Safe & Ethereum’s infrastructure enhancements.

4 Likes

Proposals: [SEP 27] Governance Amendments Season 2, Sprint 4

Vote: Accept

Rationale: We supported this governance amendment proposal because it introduces necessary flexibility to SafeDAO’s governance processes. It allows for timely amendments throughout the season, ensuring that the DAO can adapt and respond to emerging needs without being constrained to a rigid cycle.

Proposals: [SEP 28] OBRA Budget Amendments Season 2, Sprint 4

Vote: Option 2

Rationale: We are voting in support for Option 2 because it provides a balanced and equitable approach to budget redistribution. We believe that this option ensures that popular strategies with lower budgets receive the necessary funds, while maintaining a fair distribution across all strategies. By opting for a more even allocation, we can support a wider range of initiatives and foster a more inclusive environment within SafeDAO.

3 Likes

Proposals: [SEP #29] [OBRA] Nounish Safes - rocketman

Vote: Accept

Rationale: We support this proposal because it help expands the use case of Safe in governance. This initiative aligns with our goal to enhance the utility of Safe through community-driven governance, empowering users with greater control and collaborative capabilities.


Proposals: [SEP #30] [OBRA] Native Split Delegation on Mobile with Notifications about Delegate Participation - Goverland

Vote: Accept

Rationale: We support this proposal as it enhances SafeDAO’s governance UX by offering an alternative to Snapshot for utilizing the new split delegation feature. Coupled with the Goverland App’s notifications, it help streamlines user experience and boost participation by keeping stakeholders informed and engaged.


Proposals: [SEP #31] [OBRA]: Next generation frontend for decentralized Safe Registry

Vote: Make no changes

Rationale: We voted against this proposal because the grant size is too large. It would be more effective to break this into smaller, more focused projects that directly benefit the Safe ecosystem.


Proposals: [SEP #32] [OBRA] Continuation of Governance Accessibility and Participation Enhancement at SafeDAO - StableLab

Vote: Accept

Rationale: We support the continuation of StableLab’s initiative to enhance governance participation at SafeDAO, especially given the current participation challenges. Their proven track record and effective communication strategies are crucial for empowering our community and are essential steps towards revitalizing and sustaining robust governance engagement.


Proposals: [SEP #33] [OBRA] Safe Accounts for NFC Tags - Citizen Wallet

Vote: Accept

Rationale: We support this proposal because it presents an interesting use case to explore and experiment with, leveraging Safe Smart Accounts to enhance the security and functionality of NFC transactions. This initiative has the potential to provide seamless and efficient transaction experiences at events, contributing to the overall innovation and adoption within the Safe ecosystem.


Proposals: [SEP 34] [OBRA] Resource Lock Module - Cometh & Gnosis Guild & OneBalance

Vote: Accept

Rationale: We support this proposal because it offers a solution to a key cross-chain UX bottleneck in the Ethereum ecosystem by introducing the Resource Lock Module. By enabling instantaneous cross-chain interactions, this module has the potential to significantly enhance user experience and developer engagement within the SAFE ecosystem. With strong collaboration from experienced teams like Cometh, Gnosis Guild, and OneBalance, the proposal aligns with SafeDAO’s Strategy 2 to foster the module ecosystem.


Proposals: [SEP 35] [OBRA] Improve voting UI/UX with SAFE on mobile

Vote: Make no changes

Rationale: We are voting against this proposal as we believe that while sending reminders to non-signers would be a valuable feature, it would be better integrated into the existing Safe Mobile App rather than creating fragmentation by funding additional third-party application. Unless SafeDAO plans to decommission its mobile app, improvements like this should be centralized within the current ecosystem to streamline user experience and avoid redundancy. For these reasons, I am voting against this proposal at this time.


Proposals: [SEP 36]: [OBRA] - Simulations/Demos and Tidbits for All Safe Use Cases

Vote: Accept

Rationale: We support this proposal because it provides a practical solution to enhance accessibility and address a key challenge in the adoption of the Safe wallet. By offering user-friendly simulations and quick, digestible tidbits, it simplifies complex Safe use cases and helps onboard new users, ultimately increasing awareness and adoption. The team’s proven experience with similar initiatives for other major projects ensures the delivery of high-quality educational tools.


Proposals: [SEP 37] [OBRA] Contribution Efficiency System (CES) Extension - Areta

Vote: Accept

Rationale: We support this proposal because it extends a proven framework that has already enhanced oversight, accountability, and transparency across OBRA initiatives. By bridging the gap during SafeDAO’s organizational transition, the extended CES maintains continuity, ensures consistent onboarding and milestone tracking, and strengthens governance participation (Strategy 5), all while being cost-effective and carrying minimal risk for the DAO.


Proposals: [SEP 38] [OBRA] Governance Accessibility and Participation Enhancement at SafeDAO - StableLab

Vote: Accept

Rationale: We support this proposal because it directly addresses SafeDAO’s need to increase participation, while building on the demonstrable success of StableLab’s previous initiatives—especially their Weekly Updates, which have been useful in keeping members like us informed about Safe Ecosystem activities.


Proposals: [SEP 39] [OBRA] Public API Development and Continuation of SafeDAO Governance Analytics Dashboard Services - Curia

Vote: Abstain

Rationale: We abstained as this is our own proposal.


Proposals: [SEP 40] Governance Cycle Amendments Season 3, Sprint 3

Vote: Accept

Rationale: We support this proposal because it streamlines the governance cycle by removing an often-confusing Phase 0, extends the Phase 1 review period, and introduces a proposal freeze to prevent last-minute changes—ultimately giving both authors and voters more clarity and time to thoughtfully assess proposals. By adding a brief reflection period before starting the next sprint, SafeDAO can better absorb the results and feedback from each cycle, improving overall governance responsiveness and effectiveness.


Proposals: [SEP 41] [OBRA] Safe Ecosystem Roundups and Highlights by FinOps3

Vote: Accept

Rationale: We support this proposal because it addresses the need to enhance awareness and understanding of the Safe ecosystem through consistent and engaging content. The initiative will strengthen Safe’s brand, highlight its diverse solutions, and attract more builders and users.


Proposals: [SEP 42] [OBRA] Simulations and Report: Safings Accounts and Safe Vaults - Kolektivo Labs & Hopper Protocol

Vote: Accept

Rationale: We support this proposal because it aligns with SafeDAO’s strategy to enhance SAFE token utility through research and simulations that leverage insights from previous sprints. The requested funding is reasonable and justified, as the report will provide valuable insights to prioritize and develop impactful features like Safings Accounts and Safe Vaults, strengthening the SAFE ecosystem.


Proposals: [SEP 43] [OBRA] ZK Email Account Recovery - ZK Email

Vote: Accept

Rationale: We support this proposal because it provides a secure and intuitive account recovery solution. By using email-based verification with strong security measures, it ensures accessibility for a wide range of users while minimizing risks. The requested funding is reasonable and necessary to complete audits and deployment.


Proposals: [SEP 44] Creating SafeDAO’s first revenue stream through Community-Aligned Fees

Vote: Accept

Rationale: We support this proposal because it establishes a sustainable revenue stream for SafeDAO that aligns with the community’s interests. By directing fees from Native Swaps to the DAO’s treasury, we empower token holders to govern and allocate resources effectively. This approach enhances the utility of the SAFE token, fosters stronger community engagement, and promotes the long-term vibrancy of the ecosystem.


Proposals: [SEP 45] Implementation of Transition Period for Committees and Councils Structure

Vote: Accept

Rationale: We support this proposal because it aims to improve SafeDAO’s governance by adopting a more effective Committees and Councils Structure, which will help avoid voting fatigue from frequent OBRA proposals. Extending the soft launch provision gives us the flexibility to adjust and refine the new structure based on community feedback.


Proposals: [SEP 46] Safe Boost on Gnosis Chain

Vote: Accept

Rationale: We support this proposal because it will encourage more people to use Safe and Gnosis Chain by rewarding them for activities like making transactions and storing assets. Overall, it’s a good growth experiment to boost user engagement and expand the ecosystem.


Proposals: [SEP 47] [OBRA]: Lagoon built by HopperLabs: DeFi-Kit Enhancement

Vote: Accept

Rationale: We support this proposal because it aligns with the goal to increase awareness and adoption of the Safe ecosystem. Lagoon’s development has the potential to enhance the functionality of Safe and Zodiac modules, making asset management more accessible and secure for a broader range of users. By integrating multiple protocols and enabling cross-chain vault creation, the project could foster innovation and scalability within the DeFi space.


Proposals: [SEP 48] [OBRA] User-friendly Role Generation - Gnosis Guild

Vote: Accept

Rationale: We support this proposal because it will enhance the accessibility and usability of Safe’s access control features for a broader user base. By simplifying role creation and improving execution routes, the initiative will encourage more users to adopt the Zodiac Roles Modifier, potentially increasing the TVL in Safes with Roles enabled. The experienced team from Gnosis Guild has a clear plan and achievable milestones, giving confidence in the successful execution of the project. This aligns with our strategic goals and will foster adoption within the Safe ecosystem.


Proposals: [SEP 49] Introduction of Committee and Council structure within Outcomes-based resource allocation framework (OBRA)

Vote: Accept

Rationale: We support this proposal because it introduces a lean, specialized framework for allocating grants while maintaining checks and balances through clearly defined committees and councils. By distributing decision-making power between the Strategy Steering Committee and the Grants Council, it addresses voter fatigue, ensures domain expertise, and offers a clear process for community-driven initiatives


Proposals: [SEP 50] Establishing a DAO Oversight Committee to bring Strategy, Process & Accountability to Treasury Management to the SafeDAO

Vote: Accept

Rationale: We support this proposal because it appears to offer a structured approach to treasury management that balances specialized oversight with continued DAO authority. By introducing a dedicated Treasury Management Steering Committee, SafeDAO may benefit from targeted expertise around asset diversification and long-term financial sustainability, while still maintaining ultimate decision-making power in the hands of the community.


Proposals: [SEP 51] [OBRA] Develop and Integrate Ecosystem Vaults - LuukDAO

Vote: Accept

Rationale: We support this proposal because it builds on proven momentum from Ecosystem Accounts and aligns with SafeDAO’s broader goal of expanding user adoption through practical, secure DeFi offerings. By introducing user-friendly vault strategies that combine Safe’s security modules with incentives from L2 partners, Ecosystem Vaults can attract diverse ecosystem participants, encourage more deposits, and potentially generate new revenue streams.


Proposals: [SEP 52] [OBRA] Contribution Efficiency System (CES) Bridge Extension - Areta

Vote: Accept

Rationale: We support this proposal because it extends a proven operational framework that ensures OBRA continuity until the new council structure is fully established, while keeping costs low and allowing for early termination if needed. With its track record of effectively onboarding, tracking, and reporting on dozens of initiatives, the CES is already familiar with OBRA’s workflow and can help maintain consistent governance participation during this transitional period.


Proposals: [SEP 53] Governance Amendments Season 4, Sprint 4

Vote: Accept

Rationale: We support this proposal because it removes unnecessary constraints on governance activity and allows SafeDAO to discuss critical governance, budget, and resource allocation proposals throughout all Sprints. This added flexibility is more aligned with the DAO’s current maturity and reduced proposal volume, ensuring that time-sensitive decisions can move forward without waiting for Sprint 4’s dedicated slot.

1 Like

Proposals: [SEP 54] Temporary pause on resource allocation of SafeDAO

Vote: Accept

Rationale: We support this temporary funding pause as it allows the core team to focus entirely on the critical launches of Safe Labs and Safe Research. While a halt in funding is a drawback, we see this as a responsible, time-bound measure with a clear path to resumption and a valuable opportunity to design a more effective funding framework for the future.

1 Like