Safe DAO Human Capital Sustainability Brief

Safe DAO provides critical treasury security infrastructure for leading decentralized organizations. In October 2025, the Ethereum Foundation migrated its $650 million treasury to Safe. MakerDAO, Uniswap, Aave, and Yearn collectively manage billions through Safe’s emergency funds and multisig upgrade infrastructure. Despite securing over $100 billion in total value, Safe’s protocol generates less than $2.12 million in annual onchain revenue primarily through CowSwap fees, comparable to a boutique fintech firm.


The Interface Model

Safe Labs GmbH, a Berlin-based entity with approximately 60 employees, operates the Safe{Wallet} interface, which has collected all commercial fees since 2022. Partners provide onboarding, distribution, and enterprise deployment services, but there is no established multi-tiered affiliate program. Offchain payroll and operational costs significantly exceed annual onchain revenue, suggesting either product underpricing or a lack of transparency in offchain accounting of additional income streams.


Human Capital Architecture

The human capital structure mirrors a traditional corporate-contractor division, operating as a two-tier system. Safe Labs employees receive approximately $3.6 million in annual salaries, while 75 governance guardians perform essential duties for stipends averaging only $2,000 annually, representing a 30:1 disparity between offchain remuneration and onchain rewards.

Eight top forum contributors, including Safe Labs employees lukas_berger and rmeissner, are compensated through GmbH payroll. Meanwhile, community guardians such as schmanck and auryn, who produced 89 and 76 substantive posts espectively, receive neither payment nor enhanced voting power.


Governance Concentration

A single silent wallet controls 8.4% of voting power without any forum participation. Safe Labs leadership effectively controls delegate nominations, with just three individuals proposing 78% of active delegates. Paid delegates vote on 90% of proposals but provide minimal substantive rationale for public decisions.


Financial Flows and Sustainability

Safe Labs retains all interface-generated revenue, covering the additional $4.44 million in operational costs through token sales by Hecate Ventures AG. The DAO Treasury also allocates approximately $1.05 million to OBRA grants, $265,000 to delegate compensation, $450,000 to bug bounties, and $200,000 to operations.

Hecate Ventures liquidates $6.1 million of SAFE tokens annually to fund operational deficits, depleting treasury reserves by 5.4% in 2025. The treasury operates on a multi-year runway, during which the DAO receives no revenue yield, while token holders absorb at least 8% annual sell pressure.


Structural Governance

The triple-entity structure comprises Safe Labs GmbH (Berlin), Safe Ecosystem Foundation (Zug), and Hecate Ventures AG (Zug). Each entity holds mutual veto capabilities, but the Foundation’s unilateral veto authority under SEP-11 consistently blocks proposals for direct protocol-enforced revenue sharing, favoring offchain distribution mechanisms.

Safe DAO’s evolution from an open source tool launched in 2016 to a commercial entity registered in 2022, culminated in its establishment as a Swiss legal DAO in 2025, completing the externalization cycle of the onchain computational governance. Leading DAOs continue to rely on Safe because no alternative offers equivalent freemium, institutional-grade security. Layer 1, Layer 2, and decentralized application treasuries all depend on Safe’s canonical singleton contract architecture.


Conclusion

Safe DAO secures decentralized finance’s collective wealth, yet its internal governance and human capital architecture face systemic erosion. The triple-entity structure creates circular accountability that benefits Safe Labs GmbH and silent large stakeholders, while extracting uncompensated labor from guardians and community delegates.

The DAO budget experiences continuous dilution without transparent revenue distribution. The interface partnership model generates value that flows exclusively to centralized entities, with significant vested holdings scheduled to unlock throughout 2026. Current trajectory risks crystallizing Safe as a boutique protocol foundation rather than restructuring as a vertically integrated interface with aligned value flows.


Copyright © 2025, INCA DAO Research. Reproduction requires a formal licensing agreement.

2 Likes