While it’s understandable that you and some other members of SafeDAO have strong personal opinions on the transferability, the discourse in this thread feels isolated from the rest of the conversations within SafeDAO. The majority of the conversation in this thread revolves exclusively around the non-transferability itself, but there is no constructive discussions what fundamentally changed so that some milestones from SEP #3 should not be applicable anymore.
Instead, numerous members of SafeDAO are dedicating their time and effort to progressing our milestones and work on drafting proposals, giving feedback and showing up on governance calls (here are all the participants and the notes from the last one). This is where we are standing:
-
The governance framework is currently in Phase 1 (How do we make decisions?)
-
The resource allocation framework is in Phase 0 (How do we spend funds?)
-
The token utility framework is pending and the first steps into this direction have been made with the whitepaper for the Safe{Core} Protocol and the token design discovery (What is the functionality of the token?)
-
The second allocation for users from SEP #5 is currently being redeemed, and
-
The first wave of our grants program is actively underway.
With regard to the argument that no new members can join us, there are paths forward even before transferability:
- SEP #6 mentions the possibility for a retroactive token allocation for SGP Wave 1 participants
- 50% of the non-redeemed user allocation is outstanding and could be used to allocate the token to users that have not claimed their first airdrop, users on different chains or otherwise
I’d like to invite both of you, and anyone else interested, to our next governance call on Tuesday, 26 September from 7-8pm CET. We’ll be discussing the resource allocation framework in detail.
We’ll also extend the call by 30min (8:00-8:30pm CET) so we have dedicated time where you can raise any concerns with SEP #3 or the milestones overall.