This makes sense. Even if we do extend the claim period, a substantial amount of unclaimed tokens would still remain and we’re back to square one on what to do with unclaimed tokens.
Your points on time management also brings up the issue of when these ideas would be rolled out. So, I see four potential use cases brought up here for the unclaimed tokens which if done one after another would take more than a year to conclude. Rather than focus on one us case like redistribute, lets focus on everything and prioritize the ones that are more important. Here’s an example.
- claim extension;
- redistribution;
- layer 2 airdrop;
- dev grants; and
- treasury.
We could even take these and throw them into a snapshot vote for community decision on what to exclude/prioritize, w/e is faster.
For token allocation we could do it a little different.
A vote with weighted averages and some hocus pocus math to come up with a percentage token distribution across all options (except for claim extension, see next paragraph). u can choose to put all your vote into treasury (do nothing) or split it 50/50, 50/30/20, w/e u think works.
For claim extensions, a form submission for safe owners with unclaimed tokens would track the total token allocation for the claim extension allocation. since we would get a definitive number of safe tokens to work with, the remaining tokens would be voted on as stated above.
once we’ve done those two votes we come up with a roadmap based on the results so where all on the same page. then we just start knocking off items on the list starting from the top.