Summarizing a few points made by various people across this and the Implementation of Transition Period Proposal thread:
Concerns
- Concerns that councils/committees can add more process / a bureaucratic layer
- The lack of available talent with high-context to Safe’s ecosystem is hindering the proper formalization of conflict of interests between delegates and council members.
- @NoNonsenseValue argues there’s currently not enough accountability of delegates
Open Discussions:
- Should the group (currently “Councils”) responsible for a specific strategy make funding decisions within their scope and have the authority to execute specific initiatives?
- @Nneoma_StableLab advocates for working groups that have both functions
- In relation to the point above, should delegates be allowed in Committees and Councils as well?
- Should we uphold delegation accountability with firmer requirements (terms, participation threshold), with launch of split delegation?
- Should we have working groups instead of councils/committees?
- @Nneoma_StableLab advocates for working group and @LuukDAO advocates for DAO Ops to be a working group