Hi @amy.sg and team,
Thanks for providing such a detailed write-up of the Committees and Council Structures.
Some comments and Qs from my side:
- How will the Strategy Steering Committee get input from the SAFE ecosystem to create strategies? With all initial members being SEF members, we risk this becoming an internal discussion, with information and rationale becoming siloed. Let’s ensure there are paths to provide input and good documentation of the process and rationale.
- I feel “Community Development” could be changed to “Ecosystem Development,” as much of Safe’s success depends on the solutions built on top of and around our ecosystem. I believe this pillar should also focus on clear business and value alignment/programs between Safeecosystem participants and optimize long-term ecosystem health.
- The governance and DAO operations strategy could be better run as a working group, instead of adding another layer of coordination. For DAO ops, from my experience, having a high-context, hands-on team who are judged by the combined impact of the design and execution of DAOops works best.