Towards a Governance Framework for SafeDAO

I think one of the very obvious shortcomings of SafeDAO is: Those participating in the forum discussions are only a small percentage of safedao members(also small percentage in voting power), and many people will only participate in the discussions after the official Twitter @safe@safegovernance announces the proposal.

In fact, the proposals under discussion need to receive more attention to ensure that the opinions of the majority of DAO members are fully considered before the proposals enter the vote.

I think these proposals need to be retweeted by the official twitter immediately, because the proposal author is obviously trying to solicit the opinions of the community, if there is not enough feedback during the discussion stage, the proposal may enter the vote in an imperfect status.

And there is another important point, I think all temperature check votes must retweet by the official twitter, otherwise the temperature check is meaningless, SafeDAO needs to make full use of and play the role of temperature check.

https://snapshot.org/#/safegov.eth/proposal/0xe72815c4eef26024868ee77af637c96ad0b844df4957b969d8ca04fca67094f7
For example, the temperature check in SEP#2, the result is completely different from the final voting result
https://snapshot.org/#/safegov.eth/proposal/0xfbff5ca5d50b356a45fdc56fad4d80b60a761350872a36ee8f6767fe6d616fb1
The temperature check in SEP#5 only got 3m votes, knowing that a proposal will usually end up with a vote greater than 15m in the end, and this kind of temperature vote is obviously not fully participated.

In other words, I propose that temperature checks become a necessary part of the governance process, and that all temperature check votes must be announced by the official twitter to ensure full participation.

1 Like