Yeah, this is totally fair enough.
I missed this context.
I think the other part of what was less than ideal was just the phrasing of the options.
I think it probably could have been worded more simply / clearly.
- redistribute 1/3 of unclaimed tokens
- redistribute 1/2 of unclaimed tokens
- redistribute 2/3 of unclaimed tokens
- redistribute ALL unclaimed tokens
- Abstain
- Make no changes
B and “make no change” are functionally similar, so the options explicitly mentioning B seem somewhat redundant.
Perhaps a question for another thread, but I also wonder whether “make no change” should always be the first option. There are some subtle biases introduced to polls by the order and priority (option A vs B, 1 vs 2, etc) of the options. Similarly, perhaps we should avoid labels, like “option A”, in favour of short descriptive labels, like “redistribute 1/3”.