Not sure what you mean. The timeline was/is as follows:
- SEP created, review period for at least six days.
- proposal changed, new review period for six days.
- proposal uploaded to snapshot, triggers automatic 24h voting delay to make sure parameters are correct. This is a standard Snapshot feature which is also outlined in our governance process.
- proposal open for voting on Snapshot for 7 days
- if the Snapshot proposal passes, a SafeSnap escalation game takes place where the outcome can be challenged and, after a safety delay, anyone can trigger the final on-chain execution of this proposal
Also who do you mean by „they“? This proposal really was proposed by Daniel who’s not part of the Safe team and uploaded to Snapshot by Bruce who is neither. Whenever I commented on adhering to our governance process, I wouldn’t call that „dragging it“ but just making sure things are in order based on [HOW TO] SafeDAO Governance Process.
