[SEP #2] Community Initiative To Unpause Token Contract (Enabling Transferability)

Have to disagree. I think it’s important that the SafeDAO community agrees on [SEP #1] SafeDAO Participation Agreement before conducting this vote.

As @Daniel has pointed out above, this is still in Phase 0, as it’s just a discussion. In order to move toward a vote, it would need to be moved to an SEP.

While I understand some SAFE holders have a preference to unpause the token contract, I do not see any reason to move to an SEP and execute a vote before SEP#1 is put up for a vote. This isn’t a time sensitive issue, and it’s important to come together as a community and reach consensus on the participation agreement.

I’ve shared my thoughts above, but I support @Daniel’s preference to keep this discussion open until the end of the month, so those who claim their SAFE and begin to review and contribute to the forum can weigh in and share their views on unpausing the token contract.

4 Likes